The coinages of early modern Europe, which were basically a continuation of those created in the medieval era, were composed of the two precious metals—gold and silver—and the base metal copper. Most European countries and regions continued to employ a monometallic system based on silver, but supplemented by gold and copper. Silver provided the essential link between physical coins and the monetary systems in most principalities, in that the silver penny (with a few exceptions) always equalled the value of one penny in that principality's money of account: i.e., the denarius, denaro, denier, Pfenning. From Carolingian times (c. 795), the most widely used system in western Europe (except in Spain and parts of Germany) was based on the pound (libra, lira, livre, Pfund) —originally equal in value to the Carolingian pound weight of silver (489.51 g). For accounting purposes, it was subdivided into twenty shillings (solidi, soldi, sous, Schillingen), which in turn were subdivided into twelve pennies or pence, so that each money-of-account pound always consisted of 240 currently circulating pennies. For centuries, the only silver coins struck were the various regional pennies (and their subdivisions); and not until the later twelfth and thirteenth centuries did some Italian city-states, and then France, introduce heavier weight silver coins, known as grossi or gros. The Florentine grosso or fiorino was in fact first struck (in 1237) with a value of 12d (denari), as was the French gros tournois (12 deniers ), from 1266; but England did not issue such a "shilling coin," known as the teston, until 1504.
By that time, the English pound sterling (20s) contained, or was worth, only 186.621 grams sterling silver (92.5 percent fine) or 172.624 grams fine silver—just over half of the original Tower Pound mint weight of sterling silver, 349.914 grams, dating from shortly after the Norman Conquest; it was1.430 times heavier than the French mint weight, the marc de troyes (244.753 g—which was one-half of the old Carolingian pound). The French livre tournois by 1504 contained a mere 4.36 percent of the original Carolingian weight, now the Paris livre, of silver argent-le-roy (95.833 percent fine). Over the ensuing centuries, the explanation for this break—often an extreme divergence—from that Carolingian monetary link was coinage debasem*nt.
This development highlights the monetary importance of the base metal copper. Even the very finest coins were always alloyed with some copper, since a hardening agent was required for these soft and malleable precious metals. As indicated, English sterling silver had 7.5 percent copper, and the French argent-le-roy coins, 4.17 percent. For too many impecunious princes and city-state governments, the profits to be gained through substituting proportionately more and more of this base metal alloy—hence the term debasem*nt —for less and less silver were too tempting to resist. A complementary technique for reducing a coin's precious metal contents was simply to decrease the weight of the coin itself; together, these techniques allowed the prince to mint more and more coins of the same nominal or "face" value from a pound or marc of fine silver or gold. A more precise definition of debasem*nt is the reduction of the quantity of precious metal—silver or gold—represented in the principality's money-of-account system, that is, the pound, livre, or lira.
The profits derived from coinage debasem*nt came from a seigniorage tax on the mint's coinage output, a tax borne by those who sold bullion to the mint, but ultimately by the public at large. The government's objective in undertaking aggressive debasem*nts was to increase its mint outputs, and thus its seigniorage revenues, by forcing its subjects to remint their former good coins into a greater number of inferior ones having the same nominal or "face" value and also by luring bullion away from foreign mints by offering a higher mint price for gold or silver. Merchants who received the debased coins from the mint would profit by spending them quickly (at home or abroad) before the almost inevitable inflation ensued. Neighboring governments were in turn compelled to engage in defensive debasem*nts to maintain their own coinage outputs and mint profits.
The success of so many debasem*nts can be explained by the crudity of medieval and early modern mint techniques. In the production of so-called hammered coinage, employing an upper and lower die (hammer and anvil) to stamp the coins as well as shears to cut them, no two coins from the same batch were exactly identical; even money changers, equipped with accurate scales and touchstones, generally had great difficulty in detecting small changes in coinage alloy (fineness) and weight. Obviously, the general public was far more readily deceived by such debasem*nts and thus had to accept the seigniorage tax.
England's kings had long been a significant European exception in undertaking debasem*nts only rarely, chiefly for defensive reasons, and almost always only by reducing their coins' weight, while maintaining the traditional sterling fineness. For example, in 1526, Henry VIII altered the silver coinage for the first time in sixty-two years (since 1464) to match the current circulating standard, which had deteriorated through wear and tear, by reducing the penny's weight, and thus its silver content, by 11.13 percent (from 0.719 g to 0.639 g). From 1542 to 1551, however, he and his successor undertook the famous "Great Debasem*nt," which employed both mint-manipulating techniques. The long-traditional sterling silver standard (11 oz, 2 dwt silver) was debased to a mere three ounces of silver so that, with so much copper (9 oz), the coins "did blush with shame"; overall, the penny's silver content was reduced by 83.10 percent (to just 0.108 g silver). (Net profits from the "Great Debasem*nt" of 1544–1551, from all mints, amounted to £1,270,864.10 sterling, an immense sum for that era.) In 1553, the government restored most of the fineness (to 11 oz) and some of the weight—and thus the penny's pure silver content to 0.475 g. That task was completed with Elizabeth I's general recoinage of 1560, which restored the sterling silver standard, increasing the pure silver content to 0.480 g. Subsequently (apart from a very minor debasem*nt in 1578, reversed in 1583), the English silver coinage remained unimpaired for over forty years, until July 1601, when it underwent another minor weight reduction, reducing the silver contents by a mere 3.33 percent (to 0.464 g). Thereafter, the English sterling silver coinage remained completely unaltered for over two centuries,undergoing its final weight reduction in 1817 (by 6.03 percent, with 0.436 g pure silver in the penny).
If the Henrician "Great Debasem*nt" was therefore a striking anomaly in English monetary history, it was also not readily imitated elsewhere in early modern western Europe. It stood in sharp contrast to the monetary chaos that had afflicted the French, Flemish, Spanish, and most Italian silver coinages during the later Middle Ages. For example, fifteenth-century French coinage had become so impoverished in its silver content that the denier tournois was no longer a useful coin; and the standard or link coin became the blanc couronne or douzain ( 12d tournois; in effect, the shilling). Strengthened in 1488 to contain 1.023 grams of pure silver, it remained unaltered until 1519, when Francis I's minor debasem*nt (reducing slightly both fineness and weight) diminished its fine silver content by 11.72 percent (to 0.903 g). When this coin underwent its final alteration in 1572, it lost another 22.18 percent of its fine silver (with only 0.703 g)—if not a minimal loss, certainly not a drastic one compared to so many medieval debasem*nts.
Thereafter, and throughout the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, French monetary history is characterized by the issue of chiefly heavyweight, much finer, silver coins (see "Money and Coinage: Central and Eastern Europe"), and they generally had a fineness of full argent-le-roy. Their periodic "debasem*nts" were not effected by physical changes but were implemented by yet a third technique: an increase in their face or money-of-account value. For example, in 1641, French mints issued the écu blanc with 26.062 grams fine silver and nominal value of 3 livres tournois; by 1693 this coin, physically unchanged, had increased in value to 3 livres 12 sous tournois. By 1791, when the final French silver coin of the medieval tournois genre was issued, as the post-Revolutionary écu constitutionelle, nominally worth 6 livres (with 28.260 g pure silver), the livre tournois then contained just—and exactly—one percent of the fine silver in the Carolingian libra of about a thousand years earlier.
In early modern Italy, the various city-states and principalities (including the papacy) continued to strike their own individual coinages; but sufficient documentation is available only for Florence (to 1597). Having undergone considerable debasem*nt for much of the medieval era, its silver coinage enjoyed relative, if not complete, stability for the one hundred years from 1371 to 1471, during which time the penny or denaro picciolo lost only 13.15 percent of its fine silver contents. But in 1472, it suffered a further and most dramatic loss of 71.13 of its fine silver (with just 2.08 percent fineness); and, when last issued in 1504 (with the same silver contents), its value was raised to 2d. The effective "link" money had become the quattrino (4d), which, in the same year, 1472, lost 30.85 percent of its fine silver contents; by 1560, it had lost a further 44.02 percent of its silver (with a reduction in fineness from the original 16.67 percent in 1332 to 8.33 percent in 1560).
More complex were debasem*nts of the Florentine grosso (originally, the shilling coin). While nearly always retaining its argent-le-roy fineness (95.833 percent pure silver), its weight was periodically reduced, and its money-of-account value was increased, from 2s 0d in 1296 to 5s 6d in 1390, and finally to 7s 6d, with its final issue in 1531. During that period, its weight had been reduced by 34.03 percent, so that the pure silver content of the lira money of account, as reckoned in these grossi, had fallen by 56.02 percent. In the sixteenth century, Florentine silver coinage issues were also chiefly in the form of much heavier, higher-denomination coins, again all with argent-le-roy fineness: the Barile or Giulio, valued at 12s 6d (from 1504); the Cosimo, at one lira (that is, 20s, from 1539); the Testone, at two lire (40s, from 1540); and finally, the Piastra, at seven lire (140s, from 1568). During this century (1504 to 1597), the silver content of the lira, as reckoned in these coins, fell by only 17.24 percent (15.04 percent by 1552): from 5.386 grams to 4.4575 grams.
Even greater monetary stability was to be found in the silver coinages of sixteenth- and seventeenth-century Habsburg Spain. From 1497 to 1686, the Spanish crown consistently minted (with one exceptional minor deviation in 1642–1643) two silver coins at 93.06 percent fineness: the Real, with 3.195 grams pure silver (67 cut from an alloyed marc of 230.0465 g) and a nominal money-of-account value of 34 maravedís (375 to the ducat money of account); and the heavyweight Real known as the "piece of eight" (real de a ocho), withjust over eight times as much fine silver: 25.997 grams and a value of 272 maravedís. In 1686 it was subjected to a very minor weight reduction that lowered its fine silver content to 25.919 grams. The American dollar can trace its descent from this Spanish coin.
The more interesting Spanish monetary phenomenon was the issue of petty billon or vellon coinage, beginning with the blanca of 1583, with a fineness of just 1.39 percent (containing only 0.0146 g silver), and a nominal value 0.5 maravedí. That was followed in 1597 by the maravedí coin itself, with a fineness of only 0.35 percent (and a silver content of just 0.0063 g); in 1599 that became Spain's first purely copper coin (minted at 140 per copper marc, and from 1602 at 280 per marc ). Certainly, some of the ensuing inflation in seventeenth-century Spain, with a widening gap between nominal and silver-based prices, ranging from 4.0 percent in 1620 to 104.2 percent in 1650, has to be explained by such issues of copper coinage. Large volumes of copper coinages were made possible first by the central European silver and copper mining boom (c. 1460–1535), but subsequently and more especially, by the enormous expansion in Swedish copper production, peaking in the 1660s. The first European principality to issue a copper coinage had been, however, the Habsburg Netherlands, in 1543 (France, only in 1607, and England, not until 1672).
The Spanish-dominated government in the Habsburg Netherlands (from 1506) managed to retain, until the Revolt of the Netherlands broke out in 1568, a remarkable monetary stability. (The previous Burgundian regime had managed to achieve some stability only toward its end, in the years 1496–1500, after almost a century of frequently severe debasem*nts.) The one significant set of Habsburg monetary changes took place in 1521, under Emperor Charles V. The silver stuiver or double groot (2d) was debased very slightly, in fineness only, so that it lost a mere 3.26 percent of its silver content (from 0.977 g to 0.945 g); and the pound groot Flemish, in terms of 120 stuivers (240d), now contained 113.453 grams fine silver. The major objective of the monetary change was to issue a new, heavier-weight silver coin, the double Carolus or Réal, 93.40 percent fine, and thus similar to the Spanish Real, though containing just 2.858 grams fine silver, and worth 6d groot (3 stuivers ). These silver coinages remained unchanged until 1553, when the stuiver underwent a debasem*nt of 4.80 percent, so that the pound groot Flemish now contained 108.00 grams fine silver. By 1567, on the eve of the Revolt of the Netherlands, the stuiver had lost another 10 percent of its fine silver; and during the revolt era (to 1648), the stuiver of the now Spanish Netherlands lost a further 37.04 percent of its fine silver, so that the pound groot Flemish now contained only 61.20 grams fine silver—less than half of the silver prescribed in Charles V's 1521 monetary ordinance.
The major consequence of the revolt was the secession of the seven northern provinces, which, by the Union of Utrecht, in 1579, became the Republic of the United Provinces, better known as the Dutch Republic. It gained its de facto independence from Spain in the Twelve Years' Truce in 1609. Its monetary and coinage system retained, however, some important links with the pre-revolt Habsburg system. Its basic silver coin was the same stuiver, which, however, formed the shilling in the Dutch money-of-account system. The reason for this seeming anomaly is simple. From the 1460s, when the market value of the Rhenish gold florin (Rhineland Electors) had risen to 40d groot Flemish, many merchants in the then Burgundian Low Countries adopted this "florin" as an additional silver-based money of account whose value was fixed at 40d groot —one equal in value to the old livre d'Artois or livre de quarante gros. Thus, this florin money of account contained 20 stuivers, or "shillings." The other common names for the old Rhenish florin were gulden and guilder, the term for the Dutch money of account (with the symbol f ), which disappeared only with the arrival of the Euro in January 2002.
During the seventeenth century, the Dutch stuiver (as issued from 1619 to 1681) enjoyed a remarkable stability in fineness (33.333 percent fine) and weight (1.310 g) and thus in its fine silver contents, 0.436 g. The florin money of account, in terms of 20 stuivers, thus contained 8.725 grams fine silver (and the equivalent of the Flemish pound groot, as 120 stuivers, contained 52.348 g fine silver). In 1681, its silver contents were increased to 0.472 grams: by an improved fineness, to 58.30 percent, though with a reduction in weight, to0.810 grams; and it retained that composition and unchanged value (9.445 g fine silver in the florin money of account) until it was last minted in 1791, on the eve of the French Revolutionary invasion of the Dutch Republic.
Throughout this long period, the Dutch Republic also issued various series of heavyweight silver coins, chiefly used in Dutch overseas commerce. The earliest, struck from 1606, were the Rijksdaalder ('state dollar'), a named derived from the Bohemian Taler (Joachimsthaler), 87.50 percent fine, with 25.264 grams fine silver, and a value of 47 stuivers; and the Leeuwendaalder ('lion dollar'), 74.30 percent fine, with 20.459 grams five silver, and a value of 38 stuivers. Their official values were raised to 52 and 42 stuivers, respectively, in 1659, when two new heavyweight coins were issued (both struck until 1798): the Rijder ('knight'), 93.80 percent fine, with 30.388 grams fine silver, and a value of 63 stuivers; and the Dukaat (ducat), 86.80 percent fine, with 24.241 grams fine silver, and a value of 50 stuivers. Surprisingly, not until 1681, when the stuiver 's silver contents were enhanced, was an actual coin named the Gulden finally issued, with a value of 20 stuivers: 91.10 percent fine, with 9.557 grams fine silver. It is also significant that during the seventeenth century, the Dutch stuiver and the English sterling penny, as issued from 1601, with 0.464 grams fine silver, were virtually identical in silver contents, so that each had the market exchange value of the other.
The gold coinages of early modern Europe, commanding lesser economic importance, thus deserve less attention. In medieval and early modern Europe, according to many historians, their use was reserved for international trade and finance, for a reason made obvious by this example: in the years 1521–1525, a single Venetian ducat or Florentine florin (both containing about 3.45 g fine gold) could be used to purchase, on average, 628 eggs or 243 herrings on the Antwerp market; an English gold "angel" noble (with 7.735 g fine gold) could be used to purchase, on average, 934 eggs or 362 herrings. Obviously, one would never spend gold coins for such transactions; instead, a silver stuiver would more likely have been used to purchase sixteen eggs or six herrings on the Antwerp market. Yet, in the seventeenth century, western European merchants chiefly employed heavyweight silver coins, and gold only infrequently, in conducting their trade with the Baltic, Russia, the Levant (eastern Mediterranean), and Asia, for three reasons. First, the initially wide divergences in the bimetallic ratios—the ratio of the values of gold and silver, ounce per ounce, on the market—between East and West meant that silver had a much higher purchasing power in goods in these regions than it did in western Europe. The massive increases in European silver supplies, first from the central European mining boom, and then, by the 1560s, from the influx of Spanish American silver, reduced the relative value of silver, and thereby increased the bimetallic ratio in England from about 10:1 in the 1450s to 16:1, by the 1660s. But second, when the bimetallic ratios in India and London had then both achieved this level by the 1660s—thanks to the massive inflows of western silver into Asia—the Asian payments systems were still designed to accommodate the well-known European silver coins more easily than their gold coins. Third, since western merchants had little of value in merchandise to sell in these regions, and thus required precious metals to purchase about 70 percent of the value of their eastern goods (spices, silks, etc.), the ships that sailed to these regions left western ports so empty that the silver, with from twelve to sixteen times the weight of the equivalent value of gold, served as a useful ballast. For reasons that seem less obvious to the economist, these large heavyweight silver coins also predominated, from the 1550s, in the international commerce of the great European fairs.
Nevertheless, within western Europe itself, before the large, heavy silver coins achieved their predominance, gold coins had served as the more useful medium of international exchange, for two reasons. The first, as just suggested, was a superior value: weight ratio, so that merchants requiring precious metals for their commerce (rather than bills of exchange) found it more economical to transport gold, when transport costs had become so high in war-torn late-medieval Europe. Second, gold coinages were far less subject to physical coinage debasem*nts than were silver coins, especially those of small denomination. In view of the far higher value of gold coins, affluent merchants, engaged in international trade, were far more likely to test such coins for proper weight and fineness than were petty merchants using silver coins in domestic trade. Since
Gold Coinages Struck in Western Europe, 1456–1792 | |||||||||
Year First Struck | Year Last Struck | Name of Coin | Fineness in Carats: out of 24 | Percentage Fineness | Weight in Grams | Pure Gold Content in Grams | Value in Pence in Money of Account * | Value in Local Currency as Decimal Pound | Grams Pure Gold in the Pound Money of Account |
England | *pound sterling | ||||||||
1465 | 1525 | Ryal, Rose Noble | 23.875 | 99.48% | 7.776 | 7.735 | 120 | 0.500 | 15.471 |
1465 | 1525 | Angel-Noble | 23.875 | 99.48% | 5.184 | 5.157 | 80 | 0.333 | 15.471 |
1489 | 1525 | Sovereign | 23.875 | 99.48% | 15.552 | 15.471 | 240 | 1.000 | 15.471 |
1526 | 1542 | Sovereign | 23.875 | 99.48% | 15.552 | 15.471 | 270 | 1.125 | 13.752 |
1526 | 1542 | Ryal, Rose Noble | 23.875 | 99.48% | 7.776 | 7.735 | 135 | 0.563 | 13.752 |
1526 | 1542 | Crown | 22.000 | 91.67% | 3.714 | 3.404 | 60 | 0.250 | 13.617 |
1542 | 1545 | Sovereign | 23.000 | 95.83% | 12.960 | 12.420 | 240 | 1.000 | 12.420 |
1542 | 1545 | Ryal, Rose Noble | 23.000 | 95.83% | 6.480 | 6.210 | 120 | 0.500 | 12.420 |
1545 | 1546 | Sovereign | 22.000 | 91.67% | 12.441 | 11.405 | 240 | 1.000 | 11.405 |
1545 | 1546 | Ryal, Rose Noble | 22.000 | 91.67% | 6.221 | 5.702 | 120 | 0.500 | 11.405 |
1546 | 1549 | Sovereign | 20.000 | 83.33% | 12.441 | 10.368 | 240 | 1.000 | 10.368 |
1546 | 1549 | Ryal, Rose Noble | 20.000 | 83.33% | 6.221 | 5.184 | 120 | 0.500 | 10.368 |
1546 | 1549 | Crown | 20.000 | 83.33% | 3.110 | 2.592 | 60 | 0.250 | 10.368 |
1549 | 1550 | Sovereign | 22.000 | 91.67% | 10.978 | 10.063 | 240 | 1.000 | 10.063 |
1549 | 1550 | Ryal, Rose Noble | 22.000 | 91.67% | 5.489 | 5.031 | 120 | 0.500 | 10.063 |
1549 | 1550 | Crown | 22.000 | 91.67% | 2.744 | 2.516 | 60 | 0.250 | 10.063 |
1550 | 1551 | Sovereign | 23.875 | 99.48% | 15.552 | 15.471 | 288 | 1.200 | 12.892 |
1550 | 1551 | Ryal, Rose Noble | 23.875 | 99.48% | 7.776 | 7.735 | 144 | 0.600 | 12.892 |
1551 | 1553 | Sovereign | 22.000 | 91.67% | 11.310 | 10.368 | 240 | 1.000 | 10.368 |
1551 | 1553 | Ryal, Rose Noble | 22.000 | 91.67% | 5.655 | 5.184 | 120 | 0.500 | 10.368 |
1551 | 1553 | Crown | 22.000 | 91.67% | 2.828 | 2.592 | 60 | 0.250 | 10.368 |
1553 | 1560 | Sovereign | 23.875 | 99.48% | 15.552 | 15.471 | 360 | 1.500 | 10.314 |
1553 | 1560 | Ryal, Rose Noble | 23.875 | 99.48% | 7.776 | 7.735 | 180 | 0.750 | 10.314 |
1560 | 1593 | Sovereign | 23.875 | 99.48% | 15.552 | 15.471 | 360 | 1.500 | 10.314 |
1560 | 1572 | Ryal, Rose Noble | 23.875 | 99.48% | 7.776 | 7.735 | 180 | 0.750 | 10.314 |
1560 | 1593 | Sovereign | 22.000 | 91.67% | 11.310 | 10.368 | 240 | 1.000 | 10.368 |
1560 | 1572 | Crown | 22.000 | 91.67% | 2.828 | 2.592 | 60 | 0.250 | 10.368 |
1572 | 1578 | Crown | 23.875 | 99.48% | 2.592 | 2.578 | 60 | 0.250 | 10.314 |
1593 | 1601 | Sovereign | 22.000 | 91.67% | 11.310 | 10.368 | 240 | 1.000 | 10.368 |
1593 | 1601 | Crown | 22.000 | 91.67% | 2.828 | 2.592 | 60 | 0.250 | 10.368 |
1601 | 1604 | Sovereign | 22.000 | 91.67% | 11.142 | 10.213 | 240 | 1.000 | 10.213 |
1601 | 1604 | Crown | 22.000 | 91.67% | 2.785 | 2.553 | 60 | 0.250 | 10.213 |
1604 | 1612 | Unite | 22.000 | 91.67% | 10.033 | 9.197 | 240 | 1.000 | 9.197 |
1604 | 1612 | Crown | 22.000 | 91.67% | 2.508 | 2.299 | 60 | 0.250 | 9.197 |
1605 | 1612 | Rose Ryal | 23.875 | 99.48% | 13.824 | 13.752 | 360 | 1.500 | 9.168 |
1612 | 1623 | Rose Ryal | 23.875 | 99.48% | 13.824 | 13.752 | 396 | 1.650 | 8.334 |
1612 | 1623 | Crown | 23.875 | 99.48% | 2.304 | 2.292 | 66 | 0.275 | 8.334 |
1612 | 1623 | Unite | 22.000 | 91.67% | 10.038 | 9.202 | 264 | 1.100 | 8.365 |
1612 | 1623 | Crown | 22.000 | 91.67% | 2.510 | 2.300 | 66 | 0.275 | 8.365 |
1623 | 1626 | Rose Ryal | 23.875 | 99.48% | 12.581 | 12.516 | 360 | 1.500 | 8.344 |
1623 | 1626 | Unite | 22.000 | 91.67% | 9.103 | 8.345 | 240 | 1.000 | 8.345 |
1623 | 1626 | Crown | 22.000 | 91.67% | 2.276 | 2.086 | 60 | 0.250 | 8.345 |
1626 | 1649 | Rose Ryal | 23.875 | 99.48% | 8.387 | 8.344 | 240 | 1.000 | 8.344 |
1626 | 1649 | Unite | 22.000 | 91.67% | 9.103 | 8.345 | 240 | 1.000 | 8.345 |
1626 | 1649 | Double Crown | 22.000 | 91.67% | 4.552 | 4.172 | 120 | 0.500 | 8.345 |
1626 | 1649 | Crown | 22.000 | 91.67% | 2.276 | 2.086 | 60 | 0.250 | 8.345 |
1649 | 1660 | Unite | 22.000 | 91.67% | 9.103 | 8.345 | 240 | 1.000 | 8.345 |
1649 | 1660 | Crown | 22.000 | 91.67% | 2.276 | 2.086 | 60 | 0.250 | 8.345 |
1660 | 1686 | Rose Ryal | 23.875 | 99.48% | 8.387 | 8.344 | 240 | 1.000 | 8.344 |
1660 | 1686 | Unite | 22.000 | 91.67% | 9.103 | 8.345 | 240 | 1.000 | 8.345 |
1660 | 1686 | Crown | 22.000 | 91.67% | 2.276 | 2.086 | 60 | 0.250 | 8.345 |
1686 | 1703 | Unite | 22.000 | 91.67% | 8.387 | 7.689 | 240 | 1.000 | 7.689 |
(continued) |
Gold Coinages Struck in Western Europe, 1456–1792 | |||||||||
Year First Struck | Year Last Struck | Name of Coin | Fineness in Carats: out of 24 | Percentage Fineness | Weight in Grams | Pure Gold Content in Grams | Value in Pence in Money of Account * | Value in Local Currency as Decimal Pound | Grams Pure Gold in the Pound Money of Account |
England | *pound sterling | ||||||||
1686 | 1703 | Double Crown | 22.000 | 91.67% | 4.194 | 3.844 | 120 | 0.500 | 7.689 |
1703 | 1718 | Unite | 22.000 | 91.67% | 8.387 | 7.689 | 240 | 1.000 | 7.689 |
1703 | 1718 | Double Crown | 22.000 | 91.67% | 4.194 | 3.844 | 120 | 0.500 | 7.689 |
1718 | 1815 | Guinea | 22.000 | 91.67% | 8.387 | 7.689 | 252 | 1.050 | 7.322 |
1718 | 1815 | Half Guinea | 22.000 | 91.67% | 4.194 | 3.844 | 126 | 0.525 | 7.322 |
France | *livre tournois | ||||||||
1456 | 1483 | écu neuf | 23.125 | 96.35% | 3.447 | 3.322 | 330 | 1.375 | 2.416 |
1474 | 1494 | écu couronne | 23.125 | 96.35% | 3.399 | 3.275 | 363 | 1.513 | 2.166 |
1494 | 1519 | écu sol | 23.125 | 96.35% | 3.496 | 3.369 | 435 | 1.813 | 1.859 |
1519 | 1541 | écu sol | 23.000 | 95.83% | 3.439 | 3.296 | 480 | 2.000 | 1.648 |
1541 | 1550 | écu croisé | 23.000 | 95.83% | 3.439 | 3.296 | 540 | 2.250 | 1.465 |
1550 | 1561 | Henri d'or | 23.000 | 95.83% | 3.653 | 3.501 | 600 | 2.500 | 1.400 |
1561 | 1573 | écu d'or | 23.000 | 95.83% | 3.376 | 3.235 | 600 | 2.500 | 1.294 |
1573 | 1575 | écu d'or | 23.000 | 95.83% | 3.376 | 3.235 | 648 | 2.700 | 1.198 |
1575 | 1602 | écu d'or | 23.000 | 95.83% | 3.376 | 3.235 | 720 | 3.000 | 1.078 |
1602 | 1640 | écu d'or | 23.000 | 95.83% | 3.376 | 3.235 | 780 | 3.250 | 0.995 |
1640 | 1643 | écu d'or | 23.000 | 95.83% | 3.376 | 3.235 | 1248 | 5.200 | 0.622 |
1640 | 1669 | Louis d'or | 22.000 | 91.67% | 6.752 | 6.189 | 2400 | 10.000 | 0.619 |
1643 | 1669 | écu d'or | 23.000 | 95.83% | 3.376 | 3.235 | 1254 | 5.225 | 0.619 |
1655 | 1669 | Lis d'or | 23.250 | 96.88% | 4.046 | 3.919 | 1680 | 7.000 | 0.560 |
1669 | 1687 | Louis d'or | 22.000 | 91.67% | 6.752 | 6.189 | 2640 | 11.000 | 0.563 |
1687 | 1689 | Louis d'or | 22.000 | 91.67% | 6.752 | 6.189 | 2700 | 11.250 | 0.550 |
1689 | 1693 | Louis à l'écu | 22.000 | 91.67% | 6.752 | 6.189 | 3000 | 12.500 | 0.495 |
1693 | 1704 | Louis aux 4 lions | 22.000 | 91.67% | 6.752 | 6.189 | 3360 | 14.000 | 0.442 |
1704 | 1709 | Louis aux 8 lions | 22.000 | 91.67% | 6.752 | 6.189 | 3600 | 15.000 | 0.413 |
1709 | 1716 | Louis aux 8 lions | 22.000 | 91.67% | 8.158 | 7.479 | 4800 | 20.000 | 0.374 |
1716 | 1718 | Louis Noailles | 22.000 | 91.67% | 12.238 | 11.218 | 7200 | 30.000 | 0.374 |
1718 | 1720 | Louis Malte | 22.000 | 91.67% | 9.790 | 8.974 | 8640 | 36.000 | 0.249 |
1719 | 1720 | Quinzain | 23.875 | 99.48% | 3.737 | 3.717 | 3600 | 15.000 | 0.248 |
1720 | 1723 | Louis aux 2 lions | 22.000 | 91.67% | 9.790 | 8.974 | 12960 | 54.000 | 0.166 |
1723 | 1726 | Louis mirliton | 22.000 | 91.67% | 6.527 | 5.983 | 6480 | 27.000 | 0.222 |
1726 | 1740 | Louis lunettes | 22.000 | 91.67% | 8.158 | 7.479 | 4800 | 20.000 | 0.374 |
1740 | 1785 | Louis bandeau (lunettes) | 22.000 | 91.67% | 8.158 | 7.479 | 5760 | 24.000 | 0.312 |
1785 | 1792 | Louis écu | 22.000 | 91.67% | 7.649 | 7.011 | 5760 | 24.000 | 0.292 |
Southern Netherlands | *pond groot Flemish | ||||||||
1466 | 1467 | Florin de Bourgogne | 19.000 | 79.17% | 3.399 | 2.691 | 41.00 | 0.171 | 15.753 |
1467 | 1474 | Philippus Florin | 19.000 | 79.17% | 3.399 | 2.691 | 42.00 | 0.175 | 15.378 |
1474 | 1477 | Florin de Bourgogne | 19.000 | 79.17% | 3.399 | 2.691 | 48.00 | 0.200 | 13.456 |
1477 | 1482 | Florin de Bourgogne | 19.000 | 79.17% | 3.399 | 2.691 | 54.00 | 0.200 | 13.456 |
1482 | 1487 | Florin de Bourgogne | 19.000 | 79.17% | 3.399 | 2.691 | 60.00 | 0.250 | 10.765 |
1487 | 1489 | Grand réal | 23.792 | 99.13% | 14.834 | 14.705 | 432.00 | 1.800 | 8.169 |
1487 | 1489 | Noble de Bourgogne | 23.792 | 99.13% | 7.417 | 7.352 | 216.00 | 0.900 | 8.169 |
1489 | 1492 | Florin de Bourgogne | 19.000 | 79.17% | 3.399 | 2.691 | 40.00 | 0.167 | 16.147 |
1489 | 1492 | Double Florin | 23.792 | 99.13% | 5.563 | 5.514 | 80.00 | 0.333 | 16.543 |
1492 | 1495 | Florin de Bourgogne | 19.000 | 79.17% | 3.399 | 2.691 | 48.00 | 0.200 | 13.456 |
1492 | 1495 | Florin de Bourgogne | 18.500 | 77.08% | 3.263 | 2.516 | 46.00 | 0.192 | 13.124 |
1495 | 1496 | Florin de Bourgogne | 19.000 | 79.17% | 3.399 | 2.691 | 54.00 | 0.225 | 11.961 |
1496 | 1499 | Toison d'or | 23.792 | 99.13% | 4.491 | 4.452 | 96.00 | 0.400 | 11.130 |
1496 | 1499 | Philippus Florin | 16.000 | 66.67% | 3.308 | 2.205 | 48.00 | 0.200 | 11.025 |
(continued) |
Gold Coinages Struck in Western Europe, 1456–1792 | |||||||||
Year First Struck | Year Last Struck | Name of Coin | Fineness in Carats: out of 24 | Percentage Fineness | Weight in Grams | Pure Gold Content in Grams | Value in Pence in Money of Account * | Value in Local Currency as Decimal Pound | Grams Pure Gold in the Pound Money of Account |
Southern Netherlands (cont.) | *pond groot Flemish | ||||||||
1499 | 1521 | Toison d'or | 23.792 | 99.13% | 4.491 | 4.452 | 100.00 | 0.417 | 10.685 |
1499 | 1521 | Philippus Florin | 16.000 | 66.67% | 3.308 | 2.205 | 50.00 | 0.208 | 10.584 |
1500 | 1521 | Philippus Florin | 15.917 | 66.32% | 3.308 | 2.194 | 50.00 | 0.208 | 10.529 |
1521 | 1556 | réal d'or | 23.792 | 99.13% | 5.321 | 5.275 | 127.00 | 0.529 | 9.968 |
1521 | 1556 | Carolus florin | 14.000 | 58.33% | 2.914 | 1.700 | 42.00 | 0.175 | 9.712 |
1556 | 1559 | réal d'or | 23.792 | 99.13% | 5.321 | 5.275 | 140.00 | 0.583 | 9.042 |
1556 | 1559 | couronne d'or | 22.292 | 92.88% | 3.423 | 3.180 | 80.00 | 0.333 | 9.538 |
1559 | 1567 | couronne d'or | 22.292 | 92.88% | 3.423 | 3.180 | 82.00 | 0.342 | 9.306 |
1567 | 1572 | florin de Bourgogne | 18.583 | 77.43% | 3.263 | 2.527 | 68.00 | 0.283 | 8.918 |
1572 | 1574 | florin de Bourgogne | 18.583 | 77.43% | 3.263 | 2.527 | 69.00 | 0.288 | 8.789 |
1574 | 1576 | florin de Bourgogne | 18.583 | 77.43% | 3.263 | 2.527 | 71.00 | 0.296 | 8.541 |
1576 | 1577 | florin de Bourgogne | 18.583 | 77.43% | 3.263 | 2.527 | 76.50 | 0.319 | 7.927 |
1577 | 1577 | double florin | 20.000 | 83.33% | 3.022 | 2.518 | 80.00 | 0.333 | 7.554 |
1577 | 1579 | double florin | 20.000 | 83.33% | 3.022 | 2.518 | 86.00 | 0.358 | 7.027 |
1579 | 1580 | rose noble | 23.792 | 99.13% | 7.649 | 7.582 | 265.00 | 1.104 | 6.867 |
1580 | 1581 | double ducat | 23.583 | 98.26% | 7.199 | 7.074 | 240.00 | 1.000 | 7.074 |
1581 | 1589 | double ducat | 23.583 | 98.26% | 7.199 | 7.074 | 268.00 | 1.117 | 6.335 |
1589 | 1590 | double ducat | 23.583 | 98.26% | 7.199 | 7.074 | 271.00 | 1.129 | 6.264 |
1590 | 1599 | double ducat | 23.583 | 98.26% | 7.199 | 7.074 | 284.00 | 1.183 | 5.978 |
1599 | 1609 | double ducat | 23.583 | 98.26% | 6.993 | 6.920 | 300.00 | 1.250 | 5.536 |
1599 | 1609 | Albertin | 19.000 | 79.17% | 2.914 | 2.307 | 100.00 | 0.417 | 5.536 |
1609 | 1610 | Albertin | 19.000 | 79.17% | 2.914 | 2.307 | 104.50 | 0.435 | 5.298 |
1610 | 1612 | Albertin | 19.000 | 79.17% | 2.914 | 2.307 | 105.00 | 0.438 | 5.272 |
1612 | 1614 | Sovereign | 23.708 | 98.79% | 5.153 | 5.090 | 240.00 | 1.000 | 5.090 |
1614 | 1621 | Couronne (crown) | 21.167 | 88.19% | 3.411 | 3.009 | 144.00 | 0.600 | 5.014 |
1621 | 1666 | Sovereign | 22.750 | 94.79% | 5.531 | 5.243 | 266.00 | 1.108 | 4.731 |
1621 | 1666 | Couronne (crown) | 21.500 | 89.58% | 3.411 | 3.056 | 160.00 | 0.667 | 4.584 |
1666 | 1700 | Sovereign | 22.750 | 94.79% | 5.531 | 5.243 | 300.00 | 1.250 | 4.194 |
1700 | 1703 | Sovereign | 22.750 | 94.79% | 5.531 | 5.243 | 400.00 | 1.667 | 3.146 |
1702 | 1713 | Sovereign | 22.750 | 94.79% | 5.531 | 5.243 | 300.00 | 1.250 | 4.194 |
Florence | *lira di denari piccioli | ||||||||
1466 | 1467 | florin | 23.652 | 98.55% | 3.541 | 3.489 | 1344 | 5.600 | 0.623 |
1485 | 1485 | florin | 23.681 | 98.67% | 3.528 | 3.481 | 1476 | 6.150 | 0.566 |
1485 | 1486 | florin | 23.861 | 99.42% | 3.528 | 3.507 | 1500 | 6.250 | 0.561 |
1490 | 1490 | florin | 23.444 | 97.68% | 3.528 | 3.446 | 1560 | 6.500 | 0.530 |
1490 | 1491 | florin | 23.530 | 98.04% | 3.528 | 3.459 | 1560 | 6.500 | 0.532 |
1491 | 1492 | florin | 23.542 | 98.09% | 3.528 | 3.460 | 1560 | 6.500 | 0.532 |
1510 | 1511 | florin | 23.831 | 99.30% | 3.509 | 3.485 | 1680 | 7.000 | 0.498 |
1511 | 1511 | florin | 23.482 | 97.84% | 3.509 | 3.434 | 1680 | 7.000 | 0.491 |
1511 | 1512 | florin | 23.516 | 97.98% | 3.509 | 3.439 | 1680 | 7.000 | 0.491 |
1524 | 1525 | florin | 23.472 | 97.80% | 3.500 | 3.423 | 1680 | 7.000 | 0.489 |
1530 | 1533 | scudo | 22.500 | 93.75% | 3.412 | 3.199 | 1680 | 7.000 | 0.457 |
1531 | 1531 | florin | 23.820 | 99.25% | 3.500 | 3.474 | 1800 | 7.500 | 0.463 |
1533 | 1535 | scudo | 22.000 | 91.67% | 3.395 | 3.112 | 1680 | 7.000 | 0.445 |
1535 | 1548 | scudo | 22.000 | 91.67% | 3.395 | 3.112 | 1740 | 7.250 | 0.429 |
1548 | 1556 | scudo | 22.000 | 91.67% | 3.379 | 3.097 | 1740 | 7.250 | 0.427 |
1556 | 1571 | scudo | 22.000 | 91.67% | 3.379 | 3.097 | 1824 | 7.600 | 0.407 |
1571 | 1597 | scudo | 22.000 | 91.67% | 3.379 | 3.097 | 1824 | 7.600 | 0.407 |
(continued) |
Gold Coinages Struck in Western Europe, 1456–1792 | |||||||||
Year First Struck | Year Last Struck | Name of Coin | Fineness in Carats: out of 24 | Percentage Fineness | Weight in Grams | Pure Gold Content in Grams | Value in Pence in Money of Account * | Value in Local Currency as Decimal Pound | Grams Pure Gold in the Pound Money of Account |
Spain | *ducat of 375 maravedis | ||||||||
1537 | 1566 | escudo | 22.000 | 91.67% | 3.383 | 3.101 | 350 | 0.933 | 3.323 |
1566 | 1609 | escudo | 22.000 | 91.67% | 3.383 | 3.101 | 400 | 1.067 | 2.907 |
1609 | 1642 | escudo | 22.000 | 91.67% | 3.383 | 3.101 | 440 | 1.173 | 2.643 |
1642 | 1643 | escudo | 22.000 | 91.67% | 3.383 | 3.101 | 550 | 1.467 | 2.114 |
1643 | 1686 | escudo | 22.000 | 91.67% | 3.383 | 3.101 | 510 | 1.360 | 2.280 |
gold coins were given a money-of-account value in terms of the silver coinage, merchants could easily have discounted the value of a debased gold coin by reducing its exchange value proportionately. If the silver stuiver were debased by, say, 10 percent, merchants and the public would have found it impracticable to discount its value from 2d to 1.8d; instead, they would have raised prices for merchandise to compensate for the lost silver. The other reason that explains why gold coins were so infrequently subjected to physical debasem*nts was their symbolic relationship with sovereignty. Few princes—or even city-state potentates, such as the doge of Venice—would have tolerated having their reputations tarnished abroad by allowing international circulation of their debased gold (or heavyweight silver) coins; as indicated earlier, debasem*nts of small-denomination silver coins posed no such threats since most circulated only within the prince's or city-state's territory. But, as with heavyweight silver coins, a government could effect a technical "debasem*nt" of its gold coins by raising their domestic value in the silver-based money of account, as indicated in the accompanying table; that action was often necessary to maintain a desired bimetallic mint ratio when engaging in a silver debasem*nt (which thus made silver coins relatively cheaper).
In later medieval and early modern Europe, by far the two most famous gold coins were the Florentine florin, struck from 1252 to 1533, and the Venetian ducat, struck from March 1285 (not 1284, as commonly stated) until the French invasion of 1797. In theory, both of these so-called "dollars" of the Middle Ages contained about the same amount of fine gold: 3.536 grams for the florin and 3.545 grams for the ducat; and, indeed, exchange-rate evidence for France, Flanders, and England for the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries reveals that they virtually always commanded identical values in each country's local currencies. In theory, both were supposedly pure gold of twenty-four carats, but in fact they usually contained about 23.875 carats (99.48 fine), the same as the English gold noble. But unlike the noble, which periodically (every fifty years or so) underwent weight reductions, the florin only infrequently varied in either weight or fineness, by any significant amount, according to the mint accounts. Such accounts are regrettably missing for the ducat, which has, perhaps for this reason, enjoyed a better reputation with monetary historians. As the accompanying table indicates, the fine gold content of the florin, during the years 1466 to 1531, varied from a high of 3.507 grams (1486) to a low of 3.423 grams (1524). The florin ceased to be issued in 1533, when its money-of-account value (originally twenty soldi or one lira of 240d, in 1252) had reached 7 lire 10 soldi in the Florentine moneta di piccioli ; from that date it became a silver-based money of account with that fixed value. The florin had been superseded by another gold coin, known as the scudo (or écu, in French), valued at exactly 7.0 lire, inferior in both fineness and weight to the florin. It was first struck in June 1530, with only 22.5 carats (93.75 percent fine) and a weight of 3.412 grams, and thus a fine gold content of 3.119 grams. In 1533, its fineness was reduced to 22 carats (91.67 percent fine), which was retained thereafter, but by 1548 itsweight had fallen to 3.379 grams (3.097 g fine gold), while its official value has risen to 7 lire 12 soldi, increasing to 7 lire 12 soldi in 1556 (but remaining at that value for the rest of the century). As noted earlier, Florence also issued a series of heavyweight silver coins during this century.
In Venice, the ducat changed its name, though not its physical composition, in 1517 to become the zecchino (sequin d'or), a name derived from ducato di zecca (that is, ducat of the mint). The term ducat was then reserved for a silver-based money of account, with a fixed value of 6 lire 4 soldi Venetian (in current money). Subsequently (by or before 1563), the Venetians also issued a heavyweight silver coin, the ducato d'argento, more commonly called the piastra, containing 31.19 grams fine silver. All of these heavyweight silver coins—Spanish, Dutch, French, Italian, and Austrian—commanded continuous international respect, chiefly because they were not subjected to physical debasem*nts for the same reasons that the major gold coins were spared this fate. According to Herman Van der Wee, the European predominance of the large silver coins lasted until 1718, when Great Britain issued its famous gold guinea (22 carats, with 7.689 g fine gold); in doing so—though more by accident than design, in overvaluing the coin at 21 shillings—the British inaugurated the modern era of the gold standard.
For monetary historians, as well as for numismatists, every gold and silver coin has its own interesting history. If a picture is worth a thousand words, perhaps the following table on European gold coinages from the later fifteenth to late eighteenth centuries, will suffice to reveal the varieties of gold coinages and their almost continuous "debasem*nts" in terms of the fine gold content in each principality's or city-state's money of account.
See also Banking and Credit ; Charles V (Holy Roman Empire) ; City-State ; Coins and Medals ; Commerce and Markets ; Dutch Republic ; Florence ; Francis I (France) ; Henry VIII (England) ; Netherlands, Southern ; Venice .
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Bernocchi, Mario. Le monete della repubblica fiorentina. 4 vols. Florence 1974–1978.
Blanchet, Adrien, and Adophe E. Dieudonné. Manuel de numismatique française. 4 vols. Paris, 1912–1936. Vol. II: Adolphe Dieudonné. Monnaies royales françaises depuis Hugues Capet jusqu'à la Révolution. Paris, 1916.
Challis, Christopher E. The Tudor Coinage. Manchester, U.K., 1978.
Challis, Christopher E., ed. A New History of the Royal Mint. Cambridge, U.K., 1992.
Cipolla, Carlo. La moneta a Firenze nel cinquecento. Bologna, 1987. Reissued in English translation as Money in Sixteenth-Century Florence. Berkeley, 1989.
——. Money, Prices, and Civilization in the Mediterranean World. Princeton, 1956.
Craig, John. The Mint: A History of the London Mint from a.d. 287 to 1948. Cambridge, U.K., 1953.
Deschamps de Pas, Louis. Essai sur l'histoire monétaire des comtes de Flandre de la maison d'Autriche et classem*nt de leurs monnaies, 1482—1556. Paris, 1876. Originally published as articles in Revue numismatique, nouvelle série, 14 (1866): 86–114, 15 (1874), 243–266, 319–334; and in Revue belge de numismatique 32 (1876): 49–122.
Feavearyear, Sir Albert. The Pound Sterling: A History of English Money. Rev. ed. by E. V. Morgan. Oxford, 1963.
Gould, J. D. The Great Debasem*nt: Currency and the Economy in Mid-Tudor England. Oxford, 1970.
Grierson, Philip. "The Monetary Pattern of Sixteenth-Century Coinage." Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 5th series, 21 (1971): 45–60. Reprinted in Philip Grierson, Later-Medieval Numismatics (11th–16th Centuries): Selected Studies, Variorum Reprints CS98, no. XVI [n. 35]. London, 1979.
——. Numismatics. Oxford, 1975.
Lane, Frederic C., and Reinhold C. Mueller. Money and Banking in Medieval and Renaissance Venice. Vol. 1, Coins and Moneys of Account. Baltimore, 1985.
Lopez, Robert. "The Dollar of the Middle Ages." Journal of Economic History, 11 (1951): 209–234.
Motomura, Akira. "The Best and Worst of Currencies: Seigniorage and Currency Policy in Spain, 1597—1650." Journal of Economic History 54:1 (March 1994): 104–127.
——. "New Data on Minting, Seigniorage, and the Money Supply in Spain (Castile), 1597–1643." Explorations in Economic History 34:3 (July 1997): 331–367.
Munro, John. "The Monetary Origins of the 'Price Revolution': South German Silver Mining, Merchant-Banking, and Venetian Commerce, 1470—1540." In Dennis Flynn, Arturo Giráldez, and Richard von Glahn, eds., Global Connections and Monetary History, 1470–1800, pp. 1–34. Aldershot, U.K., 2003.
——. "Money, Wages, and Real Incomes in the Age of Erasmus: The Purchasing Power of Coins and of Building Craftsmen's Wages in England and the SouthernLow Countries, 1500–1540." In Alexander Dalzell and Charles G. Nauert, Jr., eds., The Correspondence of Erasmus, Vol. 12: Letters 1658–1801, January 1526–March 1527, Appendix: pp. 551–699. Toronto, 2003.
——. "Patterns of Trade, Money, and Credit." In Thomas Brady, Heiko Oberman, and James Tracy, eds., Handbook of European History, 1400–1600: Late Middle Ages, Renaissance and Reformation. Vol. I: Structures and Assertions, pp. 147–195, Leiden, 1994.
North, Michael. Das Geld und seine Geschichte: Vom Mittelalter bis zur Gegenwart. Munich, 1994.
——. Geldumlauf und Wirtschaftskonjunktur im südlichen Ostseeraum an der Wende zur Neuzeit (1440–1570). Sigmaringen, 1990.
Spooner, Frank C. The International Economy and Monetary Movements in France, 1493–1725. Harvard Economic Studies no. 138. Cambridge, Mass., 1972.
Spufford, Peter. Money and its Use in Medieval Europe. Cambridge, U.K., 1988.
Stahl, Alan M. Zecca: The Mint of Venice in the Middle Ages. Baltimore, 2000.
Ulloa, Modesto. "Castilian Seigniorage and Coinage in the Reign of Philip II." The Journal of European Economic History 4:2 (Fall 1975): 459–480.
Van der Wee, Herman. "Monetary, Credit, and Banking Systems." In E. E. Rich and C. H. Wilson, eds., Cambridge Economic History of Europe, Vol. V: The Economic Organization of Early Modern Europe, pp. 290–393. Cambridge, U.K., 1977.
Van Gelder, H. E., and Marcel Hoc. Les monnaies des Pays-Bas bourguignons et espagnols, 1434–1713: Répertoire générale. Amsterdam, 1960.
John H. Munro
Europe, 1450 to 1789: Encyclopedia of the Early Modern World MUNRO, JOHN H.